C3 AI Software Engineer Phone Screen Questions
14+ questions from real C3 AI Software Engineer Phone Screen rounds, reported by candidates who interviewed there.
What does the C3 AI Phone Screen round test?
The C3 AI phone screen typically lasts 45-60 minutes and evaluates core Software Engineer fundamentals. Candidates should expect 1-2 algorithmic problems, basic system design discussion at senior levels, and questions about relevant experience. The goal is to confirm technical competence before bringing candidates onsite.
Top Topics in This Round
C3 AI Software Engineer Phone Screen Questions
There were two questions in total. (Question practice website: 1146) (Question practice website: 437) fail
## Problem Given a grid with multiple people, find the point that minimizes the total travel distance for all to meet. ## Likely LeetCode equivalent LC 296 - Best Meeting Point (>80% confident) ## Tags matrix, math, sorting
C3 AI SWE Phone - Binary Tree Right Side View
## Problem Return the values of nodes visible from the right side of a binary tree, one per level. ## Likely LeetCode equivalent LC 199 - Binary Tree Right Side View (>80% confident) ## Tags binary_tree, bfs, dfs
## Problem Design a browser history data structure supporting visit, back, and forward operations. ## Likely LeetCode equivalent LC 1472 - Design Browser History (>80% confident) ## Tags design, stack, arrays
Company Shares - Model Equity and Compute Ownership Percentages
## Problem You are building an equity management tool. Given a list of share issuances and transfers, compute each stakeholder's current share count and ownership percentage. Operations: - `issue(to, shares)` - issue new shares to a stakeholder. - `transfer(from, to, shares)` - transfer shares between stakeholders. - `ownership() -> dict` - return `{stakeholder: (shares, pct)}` for all holders. ```python class CapTable: def issue(self, to: str, shares: int): ... def transfer(self, frm: str, to: str, shares: int): ... def ownership(self) -> dict: ... def total_shares(self) -> int: ... ``` **Example:** ``` cap = CapTable() cap.issue("Alice", 1000) cap.issue("Bob", 500) cap.transfer("Alice", "Carol", 200) cap.ownership() -> { "Alice": (800, 53.33%), "Bob": (500, 33.33%), "Carol": (200, 13.33%) } ``` ## Follow-ups 1. What happens if a transfer exceeds the sender's current holdings - raise or clamp? 2. How would you model vesting schedules (shares unlock monthly over 4 years)? 3. Add a dilution event: a new funding round issues shares and all existing percentages shrink. 4. How would you audit the full history of ownership at any past date?
C3 AI SWE Phone - Group Anagrams
## Problem Group an array of strings so that anagrams appear together, using a hash map keyed on sorted characters. ## Likely LeetCode equivalent LC 49 - Group Anagrams (>80% confident) ## Tags hash_table, strings, sorting
## Problem Given a list of daily temperature readings and a window size `k`, return the highest temperature recorded in each consecutive window of `k` days. ```python def highest_temperatures(temps: List[float], k: int) -> List[float]: ... ``` **Example:** ``` Input: temps=[3.1, 1.2, 4.5, 2.7, 6.0, 1.9, 3.3], k=3 Output: [4.5, 4.5, 6.0, 6.0, 6.0] # Windows: [3.1,1.2,4.5]->[4.5], [1.2,4.5,2.7]->[4.5], # [4.5,2.7,6.0]->[6.0], [2.7,6.0,1.9]->[6.0], [6.0,1.9,3.3]->[6.0] ``` ## Approach Use a monotonic deque. Maintain indices of temperatures in decreasing order. For each new element, pop the back of the deque while it holds smaller values. Pop the front if it slides out of the window. The front always holds the current max. Time: O(n). Space: O(k). ## Follow-ups 1. How does the deque approach work - walk through the invariant being maintained. 2. Extend to also return the minimum in each window simultaneously. 3. How would you handle missing readings (NaN) in the temperature series? 4. If readings arrive as a stream, how do you maintain the rolling max in O(1) amortized per element?
## Problem Design an iterator that interleaves elements from multiple input iterators in round-robin or alternating order. ## Likely LeetCode equivalent No direct unambiguous LC equivalent. ## Tags design, queue, iterator
## Problem Implement the following JavaScript utility functions without using the built-in equivalents: **Part 1:** Implement `myReduce(arr, fn, initialValue)` matching the behavior of `Array.prototype.reduce`. **Part 2:** Implement `myPromiseAll(promises)` matching `Promise.all` - resolves when all resolve, rejects on first rejection. **Part 3:** Implement `myFlatten(arr, depth)` matching `Array.prototype.flat(depth)`. ```js // Part 1 myReduce([1,2,3,4], (acc, x) => acc + x, 0) // -> 10 // Part 2 myPromiseAll([Promise.resolve(1), Promise.resolve(2)]).then(vs => console.log(vs)) // -> [1, 2] // Part 3 myFlatten([1,[2,[3,[4]]]],2) // -> [1, 2, 3, [4]] ``` ## Follow-ups 1. How would you implement `myPromiseAllSettled` that never rejects? 2. What happens in your `myReduce` if no `initialValue` is provided? 3. Implement `myPromiseRace` - resolves or rejects with the first settled promise. 4. How would you implement lazy evaluation using generators instead of `reduce`?
## Problem Find the contiguous subarray with the largest sum using Kadane's algorithm. ## Likely LeetCode equivalent LC 53 - Maximum Subarray (>80% confident) ## Tags arrays, dynamic_programming
## Problem Build a product listing table component. Given an array of product objects, render a table with: - Columns: Name, Category, Price, Stock. - Clicking a column header toggles sort ascending/descending on that column. - A text input filters products by name (case-insensitive, debounced 300ms). - A category dropdown filters to a single category (or "All"). - Show "No results" when the filtered list is empty. ```jsx // Data shape // {id, name, category, price, stock} function ProductTable({ products }) { // ... } ``` **Expected behavior:** ``` User clicks "Price" header -> sorted ascending by price User clicks "Price" again -> sorted descending User types "lap" in search -> shows only products with "lap" in name User selects "Electronics" in dropdown -> combined with active sort ``` ## Follow-ups 1. How do you compose sort and filter without re-deriving state on every keystroke? 2. How would you virtualize the list if there are 10,000 products? 3. Describe how to persist the sort/filter state in the URL query string. 4. How would you make the table accessible for screen readers?
## Problem Count the number of contiguous subarrays that sum to a target value k using prefix sums and a hash map. ## Likely LeetCode equivalent LC 560 - Subarray Sum Equals K (>80% confident) ## Tags arrays, hash_table, prefix_sum
## Problem Implement a `TimerQueue` class that schedules callbacks to run after a specified delay. It must support cancellation. ```python import time import threading class TimerQueue: def schedule(self, delay_ms: int, callback: callable) -> int: # Returns a timer_id ... def cancel(self, timer_id: int) -> bool: # Returns True if successfully canceled, False if already fired ... def shutdown(self): # Cancel all pending timers and release resources ... ``` **Expected behavior:** ``` tq = TimerQueue() id1 = tq.schedule(500, lambda: print("A")) # fires after 500ms id2 = tq.schedule(200, lambda: print("B")) # fires after 200ms tq.cancel(id1) # After 200ms: prints "B" # "A" never fires ``` ## Follow-ups 1. How do you implement this using a min-heap to efficiently find the next timer to fire? 2. What is the risk of a race condition between `schedule` and `cancel` and how do you prevent it? 3. How would you implement `reschedule(timer_id, new_delay_ms)`? 4. How does this compare to the JavaScript event loop's `setTimeout`/`clearTimeout` internals?
## Problem Given the root of a binary tree and a target integer `k`, return all root-to-leaf paths where the sum of node values equals `k`. Each path is a list of node values from root to leaf. ```python class TreeNode: def __init__(self, val=0, left=None, right=None): self.val = val self.left = left self.right = right def path_sum(root: TreeNode, k: int) -> List[List[int]]: ... ``` **Example:** ``` Tree: 5 / \ 4 8 / / \ 11 13 4 / \ \ 7 2 1 path_sum(root, 22) -> [[5,4,11,2], [5,8,4,5]] # Wait - no "5" child; path_sum(root, 22) -> [[5,4,11,2]] ``` ## Follow-ups 1. Modify to return the maximum sum path (not necessarily root-to-leaf - any path allowed). 2. How does the solution change for an N-ary tree? 3. How would you count the number of paths (not just root-to-leaf) summing to `k`? What data structure helps? 4. Handle negative node values - does your current solution still work?
What to Expect in the C3 AI Phone Screen Round
The C3 AI Software Engineer Phone Screen round has a specific calibration purpose distinct from other rounds in the loop. Across 14+ verified reports on LeakCode for this exact round type, the consistent expectations: clear scoping of the problem before diving into a solution, explicit reasoning about complexity, structured handling of edge cases, and the ability to discuss trade-offs between two reasonable approaches.
Reports tagged with the Phone Screen round at C3 AI show recurring patterns in difficulty and topic distribution. The Phone Screen round is typically 45-60 minutes; the interviewer is calibrated against a specific rubric. The discriminator between candidates who advance and candidates who do not is rarely the final correctness of the answer. It is the path: did you clarify, did you verbalize your approach, did you handle edge cases, and did you communicate throughout.
How To Prepare for This Specific Round
Filter the questions below to the most recent reports (past 6-12 months). Questions tagged for this exact round type from this exact company at this exact role level are the highest-signal data available. Older reports may reference questions that have since rotated out of the company's pool.
Practice 4-6 representative problems from this set under timed conditions. The goal is not memorization (companies rotate questions); the goal is to internalize the patterns the interviewer typically reaches for and the depth of follow-up to expect. Reports on LeakCode also tag the typical follow-up depth at this round type, which is the discriminating signal between hire and no-hire calibration.
Phone Screen Round Timing and Format
The Phone Screen round at C3 AI typically runs 45-60 minutes. Use the first 2-3 minutes to clarify requirements; you should never start coding or designing without verifying the input/output format, constraints, and edge cases out loud. Use the next 5-7 minutes to verbalize your approach before writing any code. The middle 20-30 minutes are implementation. Reserve the final 10 minutes for testing with concrete examples and discussing optimization or trade-offs.
Time budget discipline is one of the most reliable senior-vs-junior discriminators in this round. Strong candidates verbalize where they are in their budget out loud ("I've used about 20 minutes, I have 15 minutes left for testing and one optimization"). This signals engineering maturity to the interviewer and creates positive feedback they can capture in writing.
Common Failure Modes in This Round
Reports tagged "no hire" at C3 AI Software Engineer Phone Screen commonly cite: coding silently without verbalizing approach, jumping to implementation before clarifying requirements, missing edge cases (empty input, single element, very large input), producing working code that the candidate cannot refactor when asked, and failing to test their solution with concrete examples before declaring done.
The single most predictive failure mode in 2025-2026 reports: not asking clarifying questions. Interviewers at all FAANG companies are explicitly trained to weight this dimension. Strong candidates ask 3-5 clarifying questions even on problems that look obvious; weak candidates dive into code immediately. The clarifying-question check is often the first signal recorded in the interviewer's notes.
See All 14 Questions from This Round
Full question text, answer context, and frequency data for subscribers.
Get Access