LeakCode vs Onsites.fyi
Onsites.fyi has 73 total sitemap URLs and ranks page 1 for "meta interview questions." That is a striking fact about how domain authority and community brand can outperform raw page volume. This comparison explains what Onsites.fyi actually offers, where LeakCode is categorically different, and which tool fits which situation.
What Onsites.fyi Is
Onsites.fyi is a FAANG interview experience aggregator with 2,200+ curated interview experiences. Its company pages (e.g., onsites.fyi/Amazon, onsites.fyi/Meta) present interview experiences in a structured format. Most content is paywalled behind premium, with the free tier showing a limited preview.
The site is notably lean on total URLs: 73 total. This includes about 14 company pages, 14 blog articles, and a handful of product pages (profiles, resumes, recruiter database, premium). The quality signal that Onsites.fyi relies on is community authority: it has been cited in FAANG hiring discussions, has an associated newsletter (the FAANG Formula), and maintains a 500+ FAANG recruiter database that drives links from career communities.
The individual company pages are thin on content, roughly 250-300 words each. Most of the value is behind the premium paywall. Onsites.fyi blocks GPTBot while allowing other crawlers, which signals they do not want AI training on their content.
Where LeakCode Goes Broader
- 51,000+ entries vs 2,200+ experiences. The volume difference is large. Onsites.fyi's 2,200+ curated experiences are holistic interview reports (the full experience). LeakCode's 51,000+ entries are individual questions extracted from reports across 7 platforms. Both are valid but serve different use cases: Onsites.fyi for understanding the overall process, LeakCode for knowing the specific questions.
- 2,000+ companies vs 14. Onsites.fyi covers FAANG and a handful of unicorns. If your target company is outside that set, Onsites.fyi has nothing. LeakCode covers 2,000+ companies with meaningful question depth for the top 200-300.
- 7 source platforms. LeakCode aggregates from 1Point3Acres, Blind, LeetCode Discuss, Glassdoor, Reddit, GeeksforGeeks, and the 1p3a OJ catalog. Onsites.fyi appears to aggregate from a smaller set of platforms, with its collection focused on holistic experience reports rather than individual question extraction.
- Filter by round and role. LeakCode's filters let you drill to a specific company-role-round combination. Onsites.fyi filters by company and job title but the granularity is lower.
- JSON-LD structured data. LeakCode implements FAQPage, BreadcrumbList, and Article schemas. Onsites.fyi has none detected.
- AI crawler openness. LeakCode explicitly allows GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and Perplexity. Onsites.fyi blocks GPTBot. This means LeakCode content is more likely to appear as a source in AI search results.
What Onsites.fyi Does Better
- Holistic interview experiences. A curated holistic interview report tells you the full arc: recruiter call, technical screens, on-site structure, offer or reject outcome, timeline, and salary. This context is different from a list of individual questions. If you want to understand what a complete Amazon interview loop looks like from start to finish, Onsites.fyi's experience format is useful.
- Recruiter network. The 500+ FAANG recruiter database is a unique asset. Access to recruiter contacts is not something LeakCode provides.
- Newsletter and community brand. The FAANG Formula newsletter has cultivated a loyal audience. Brand authority in the FAANG community creates trust signals that page count alone cannot replicate. This explains the page-1 ranking with only 73 URLs.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | LeakCode | Onsites.fyi |
|---|---|---|
| Total entries | 51,000+ questions | 2,200+ holistic experiences |
| Total indexed pages | Thousands | 73 total URLs |
| Company coverage | 2,000+ | ~14 FAANG and unicorns |
| Content format | Individual questions with filters | Holistic interview experience reports |
| Recruiter network | No | 500+ FAANG recruiters |
| JSON-LD structured data | Yes | Not detected |
| GPTBot / AI crawlers | Allowed | GPTBot blocked |
| Filter by round type | Yes (OA, phone, on-site) | Company and title only |
| Update frequency | Daily | Unknown |
| Free browsing | Yes | Limited preview, mostly paywalled |
Which Tool Fits Your Situation
If you want to understand the overall arc of a FAANG interview loop and your target company is in Onsites.fyi's 14-company set, its holistic experience reports are worth reading. The recruiter network is a unique feature with no equivalent elsewhere.
If you want to know which specific questions your target company is currently asking, in which rounds, and with what frequency across independent candidate reports, LeakCode is the right tool. The scale difference (51,000+ vs 2,200+) and company breadth (2,000+ vs 14) are significant.
For FAANG prep, reading a few Onsites.fyi experience reports to understand the process structure, then using LeakCode to identify the specific question patterns, is a reasonable combined approach.
Related: LeakCode vs HelloInterview · LeakCode vs Glassdoor · LeakCode vs PracHub · Data Sources