LeetCode Question · May 2022 · Los Angeles

SAMSUNG | OA | SDE

6 upvotes 2,335 views 1 reply

Question Details

OA was conducted on Hackerearth for SDE. Problem 1 : A string S of legth N has to be reconstructed from 2(start, end)+k substrings(random length). Start substring is a prefix of S...

Full Details

OA was conducted on Hackerearth for SDE.

Problem 1 :

A string S of legth N has to be reconstructed from 2(start, end)+k substrings(random length). Start substring is a prefix of S and end substring is a suffix of S. These substrings can be overlapping each other from right, left or both sides with minimum of 4 characters.

Eg : abcde123, de123xyz, 3xyzpqr
Output : abcde123xyzpqr

Problem 3 :

Homes are aligned in a row. In any given row, maximum half of the homes are occupied. In a season, people got infected and all must vacate homes to move to unoccupied homes. Movements are sequential and not parallel (i.e one home completes the movement, then only the second home starts). To reduce the overall time taken, it\'s better to move to a nearby empty room than a farther one. i\'th home to j\'th home movement results in abs(j-i) distance. Minimize the overall distance covered by the time all infected home completes the movement to unoccupied homes.

Input : n = no of homes
String s denoting occupied and unoccupied homes(1 = occupied, 0 = unoccupied)

Example:
n = 4
"1001"

Ans : 2

Free preview — 6 questions shown. Unlock all Samsung questions →

Topics

Concurrency Strings

About Samsung Interview Reports

This question was reported by a candidate who interviewed at Samsung. LeakCode aggregates interview reports from 10+ sources, including 1Point3Acres, Glassdoor, LeetCode Discuss, Blind, Reddit, Indeed, and Nowcoder. Each report is translated where necessary, deduplicated against existing entries, and tagged by company, role, round type, and reporting date.

Use this question as one calibration data point, not a memorization target. Companies typically rotate their question pools every 2-4 months; the exact wording of a 2024 question may differ from what you encounter today. The underlying pattern, difficulty level, and follow-up depth at Samsung are the higher-signal extractions to take from this report.

For broader preparation context, the Samsung interview process typically includes a recruiter screen, one or two technical phone screens, and a 4-5 round on-site loop covering coding, system design (at L4+ levels), and behavioral. Reports tagged on LeakCode show the round-by-round distribution and typical difficulty calibration. To browse questions filtered by round type and seniority, use the company hub linked above.

How To Practice This Type of Question

Solve similar problems on LeetCode under timed conditions (25-35 minutes per medium difficulty). The goal is pattern recognition: recognize the underlying technique (sliding window, two-pointer, BFS, memoized recursion, etc.) within 60-90 seconds of reading. Strong candidates verbalize their hypothesis out loud before coding, then iterate based on feedback. Weak candidates dive into implementation immediately, lose time on the wrong approach, and run out of time for follow-ups.

Companies update their question pools every 2-4 months. The exact wording of any given question may have been retired by the time you interview. Focus your prep on the pattern, not the specific problem. The patterns that appear in Samsung reports consistently are the ones worth investing in; one-off niche problems are not.

During Your Samsung Round

Apply the standard interview round template: clarify requirements (2-3 minutes), state your approach out loud and confirm direction with the interviewer (3-5 minutes), code with narration (15-25 minutes), test with concrete examples including edge cases (5 minutes), discuss optimization or trade-offs if time permits (5 minutes). This template is universally accepted across FAANG and adjacent companies; deviating from it produces weaker interviewer feedback signal.

The single most predictive failure mode in Samsung reports tagged "no hire": not asking clarifying questions. Interviewers are explicitly trained to weight this. Strong candidates ask 3-5 clarifying questions even on problems that look obvious; weak candidates dive into code immediately. The clarifying-question check is often the first signal recorded in the interviewer's written notes.