1p3a Question · Oct 2025

TekSystems Online Assessment Algorithm Interview Experience

Question Details

Problem Statement

Goal: Minimize the number of "unhappy" students when assigning friend groups to a trip with a limited capacity.

Input: 1. groups: An array of length $n$, where each eleme

Full Details

Problem Statement

Goal: Minimize the number of "unhappy" students when assigning friend groups to a trip with a limited capacity.

Input: 1. groups: An array of length $n$, where each element represents a student's group ID. Students sharing the same ID belong to the same friend group. 2. t: An integer representing the maximum capacity of the trip.

Definitions: *

Friend Group Size: The number of students sharing the same group ID. *

Unhappy Student: A student is defined as unhappy if they are unable to go on the trip while other members of their friend group do go (i.e., the group is split). Students in groups where no one goes are not considered unhappy.

Objective: Select a subset of students to fill the trip capacity $t$ such that the total number of unhappy students is minimized. Ideally, you want to fit friend groups perfectly to avoid splitting them.

Examples: *

Example 1: * groups = [1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3] (Group sizes: ${2, 3, 2}$) * t = 4 * Optimal Approach: Taking Group 1 (size 2) and Group 3 (size 2) fills the capacity exactly ($2+2=4$). No group is split. * Note: If a Greedy approach is used (taking largest group of 3 first), 1 slot remains. Splitting the next group of 2 leaves 1 person behind, resulting in 1 unhappy student. *

Example 2: * groups = [1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4] (Group sizes: ${2, 3, 2, 1}$) * t = 3 * Result: 0 unhappy students (Taking Group 2 of size 3 fills the capacity perfectly). --- # Efficient Algorithmic Solution The Greedy approach (sorting by frequency and assigning) fails because this is a variation of the

Knapsack Problem or

Subset Sum Problem. A greedy strategy does not guarantee that the combination of groups sums exactly to $t$. ### Recommended Approach: Dynamic Programming (Subset Sum) To solve this efficiently, treat the group sizes as items with weights. We want to find a subset of these weights that sums to exactly $t$, or as close to $t$ as possible, to minimize the split.

Algorithm Steps: 1.

Frequency Map: Convert the input array groups into a list of group sizes. *

Input: [1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3] $\rightarrow$ Sizes: [2, 3, 2] 2.

Boolean DP (Reachability): Use a boolean array dp of size $t + 1$. dp[i] will be true if a capacity of i can be filled perfectly using whole groups. * Initialize dp[0] = true, all others false. * Iterate through each group size s. * Update the DP table: for j from t down to s, dp[j] = dp[j] OR dp[j - s]. 3.

Determine Minimum Unhappiness: *

Case A (Perfect Fit): Check dp[t]. If true, a subset of groups sums exactly to t. No groups need to be split.

Answer: 0. *

Case B (Split Required): If dp[t] is false, we cannot fill the trip with whole groups. We must fill the remaining space by splitting one group. * Iterate through all reachable capacities i (where dp[i] is true). * For each valid i, the remaining space is rem = t - i. * We need to find a remaining group of size G > rem to fill this gap. The number of unhappy students will be G - rem (the portion of the group left behind). * Minimize G - rem across all valid combinations.

Complexity: *

Time Complexity: $O(N \times t)$, where $N$ is the number of groups. *

Space Complexity: $O(t)$ for the DP array.

Free preview — 6 questions shown. Unlock all Teksystems questions →

About This Question

This is a reported interview question from a teksystems interview for a swe role during the oa round reported in 2025.

It covers the following topics: Arrays, Backtracking, Dynamic Programming, Greedy, Sorting, Sql .

About Teksystems Interview Reports

This question was reported by a candidate who interviewed at Teksystems. LeakCode aggregates interview reports from 10+ sources, including 1Point3Acres, Glassdoor, LeetCode Discuss, Blind, Reddit, Indeed, and Nowcoder. Each report is translated where necessary, deduplicated against existing entries, and tagged by company, role, round type, and reporting date.

Use this question as one calibration data point, not a memorization target. Companies typically rotate their question pools every 2-4 months; the exact wording of a 2024 question may differ from what you encounter today. The underlying pattern, difficulty level, and follow-up depth at Teksystems are the higher-signal extractions to take from this report.

For broader preparation context, the Teksystems interview process typically includes a recruiter screen, one or two technical phone screens, and a 4-5 round on-site loop covering coding, system design (at L4+ levels), and behavioral. Reports tagged on LeakCode show the round-by-round distribution and typical difficulty calibration. To browse questions filtered by round type and seniority, use the company hub linked above.

How To Practice This Type of Question

Solve similar problems on LeetCode under timed conditions (25-35 minutes per medium difficulty). The goal is pattern recognition: recognize the underlying technique (sliding window, two-pointer, BFS, memoized recursion, etc.) within 60-90 seconds of reading. Strong candidates verbalize their hypothesis out loud before coding, then iterate based on feedback. Weak candidates dive into implementation immediately, lose time on the wrong approach, and run out of time for follow-ups.

Companies update their question pools every 2-4 months. The exact wording of any given question may have been retired by the time you interview. Focus your prep on the pattern, not the specific problem. The patterns that appear in Teksystems reports consistently are the ones worth investing in; one-off niche problems are not.

During Your Teksystems Round

Apply the standard interview round template: clarify requirements (2-3 minutes), state your approach out loud and confirm direction with the interviewer (3-5 minutes), code with narration (15-25 minutes), test with concrete examples including edge cases (5 minutes), discuss optimization or trade-offs if time permits (5 minutes). This template is universally accepted across FAANG and adjacent companies; deviating from it produces weaker interviewer feedback signal.

The single most predictive failure mode in Teksystems reports tagged "no hire": not asking clarifying questions. Interviewers are explicitly trained to weight this. Strong candidates ask 3-5 clarifying questions even on problems that look obvious; weak candidates dive into code immediately. The clarifying-question check is often the first signal recorded in the interviewer's written notes.