1p3a Experience · May 2026

tech phone screen at warp: designing a cli terminal data structure

SWE Phone Screen newgrad
1 upvote

Interview Experience

一个小公司,start up,做人工智能 的 CLI tool 的。面试是一个比较实际的题目,让你写一个数据结构来模拟创建一个 CLI terminal class,可以创建新的 tab,然后 tab 里面的panel可以split,然后让你写方法来序列化和反序列化。需要自己写程序和写一个 test case。实现方法就是用一个 tree,然后每次创建新的 panel 就相当于建一个 child node 最后写的差不多了,但是序列化的时候发现,split 的时候代码有一个 bug 导致会漏一层。和面试官一起 debug 了很久,他也看不出来 bug 在哪儿。 结果面试结束之后,我看出来了,然而已经太迟了。 总体来说面试官很 supportive。

Full Details

🔒

Unlock all Warp questions

Full insider details, leaked discussions, and candidate experiences.

Get full access — from $50/mo

About Warp Interview Reports

This question was reported by a candidate who interviewed at Warp. LeakCode aggregates interview reports from 10+ sources, including 1Point3Acres, Glassdoor, LeetCode Discuss, Blind, Reddit, Indeed, and Nowcoder. Each report is translated where necessary, deduplicated against existing entries, and tagged by company, role, round type, and reporting date.

Use this question as one calibration data point, not a memorization target. Companies typically rotate their question pools every 2-4 months; the exact wording of a 2024 question may differ from what you encounter today. The underlying pattern, difficulty level, and follow-up depth at Warp are the higher-signal extractions to take from this report.

For broader preparation context, the Warp interview process typically includes a recruiter screen, one or two technical phone screens, and a 4-5 round on-site loop covering coding, system design (at L4+ levels), and behavioral. Reports tagged on LeakCode show the round-by-round distribution and typical difficulty calibration. To browse questions filtered by round type and seniority, use the company hub linked above.

How To Practice This Type of Question

Solve similar problems on LeetCode under timed conditions (25-35 minutes per medium difficulty). The goal is pattern recognition: recognize the underlying technique (sliding window, two-pointer, BFS, memoized recursion, etc.) within 60-90 seconds of reading. Strong candidates verbalize their hypothesis out loud before coding, then iterate based on feedback. Weak candidates dive into implementation immediately, lose time on the wrong approach, and run out of time for follow-ups.

Companies update their question pools every 2-4 months. The exact wording of any given question may have been retired by the time you interview. Focus your prep on the pattern, not the specific problem. The patterns that appear in Warp reports consistently are the ones worth investing in; one-off niche problems are not.

During Your Warp Round

Apply the standard interview round template: clarify requirements (2-3 minutes), state your approach out loud and confirm direction with the interviewer (3-5 minutes), code with narration (15-25 minutes), test with concrete examples including edge cases (5 minutes), discuss optimization or trade-offs if time permits (5 minutes). This template is universally accepted across FAANG and adjacent companies; deviating from it produces weaker interviewer feedback signal.

The single most predictive failure mode in Warp reports tagged "no hire": not asking clarifying questions. Interviewers are explicitly trained to weight this. Strong candidates ask 3-5 clarifying questions even on problems that look obvious; weak candidates dive into code immediately. The clarifying-question check is often the first signal recorded in the interviewer's written notes.