1p3a Experience · May 2026

uber full-stack frontend software engineer phone screen interview

Frontend Phone Screen newgrad
1 upvote

Interview Experience

Phone: 给定一个数组里面都是player的rank,和输赢由rank决定的规则,输出锦标赛的结果 比较开放,最后问了一些关于数据库查询比赛记录的问题 VO: 设计Google Calendar 非常规BQ,问了很多实际工作细节包括UI相关,非常想找直接就来上手工作的人 Coding 1: LC 380 Coding 2: React 停车场系统 个人背景更偏后端,简历上有一年写前端经历也是无奈配合manager,面试过程中甚至触发了某种PTSD没有发挥好,没有回复,应该是默拒了。 能感觉BQ的manager和coding 2的组内面试官特别疲倦,但coding 1的面试官transfer过来的天竺人居然是在床上躺着面的lol。 因为签证被老公司干了,跳槽不容易,求加米。

Full Details

🔒

Unlock all Uber questions

Full insider details, leaked discussions, and candidate experiences.

Get full access — from $50/mo

About This Question

This is a candidate experience report from a uber interview for a frontend role (newgrad level) during the phone screen round reported in 2026.

It covers the following topics: Stack .

Topics

About Uber Interview Reports

This question was reported by a candidate who interviewed at Uber. LeakCode aggregates interview reports from 10+ sources, including 1Point3Acres, Glassdoor, LeetCode Discuss, Blind, Reddit, Indeed, and Nowcoder. Each report is translated where necessary, deduplicated against existing entries, and tagged by company, role, round type, and reporting date.

Use this question as one calibration data point, not a memorization target. Companies typically rotate their question pools every 2-4 months; the exact wording of a 2024 question may differ from what you encounter today. The underlying pattern, difficulty level, and follow-up depth at Uber are the higher-signal extractions to take from this report.

For broader preparation context, the Uber interview process typically includes a recruiter screen, one or two technical phone screens, and a 4-5 round on-site loop covering coding, system design (at L4+ levels), and behavioral. Reports tagged on LeakCode show the round-by-round distribution and typical difficulty calibration. To browse questions filtered by round type and seniority, use the company hub linked above.

How To Practice This Type of Question

Solve similar problems on LeetCode under timed conditions (25-35 minutes per medium difficulty). The goal is pattern recognition: recognize the underlying technique (sliding window, two-pointer, BFS, memoized recursion, etc.) within 60-90 seconds of reading. Strong candidates verbalize their hypothesis out loud before coding, then iterate based on feedback. Weak candidates dive into implementation immediately, lose time on the wrong approach, and run out of time for follow-ups.

Companies update their question pools every 2-4 months. The exact wording of any given question may have been retired by the time you interview. Focus your prep on the pattern, not the specific problem. The patterns that appear in Uber reports consistently are the ones worth investing in; one-off niche problems are not.

During Your Uber Round

Apply the standard interview round template: clarify requirements (2-3 minutes), state your approach out loud and confirm direction with the interviewer (3-5 minutes), code with narration (15-25 minutes), test with concrete examples including edge cases (5 minutes), discuss optimization or trade-offs if time permits (5 minutes). This template is universally accepted across FAANG and adjacent companies; deviating from it produces weaker interviewer feedback signal.

The single most predictive failure mode in Uber reports tagged "no hire": not asking clarifying questions. Interviewers are explicitly trained to weight this. Strong candidates ask 3-5 clarifying questions even on problems that look obvious; weak candidates dive into code immediately. The clarifying-question check is often the first signal recorded in the interviewer's written notes.