Dell Interview Questions (May 2026)
10 questions · 8 experiences · GeeksforGeeks (15) · LeetCode (3)
Browse by role
Top topics
18 entries
Dell Technologies: Interview Experience for SDE-1
DELL Interview | Set 1 (On-Campus)
Dell Internship Interview Experience | On-Campus 2021
Dell Technologies Interview Experience for Graduate Intern
Dell Interview Experience for Software Engineer-1 (On-Campus)
Dell Interview Experience for Internship
Dell Interview Experience- On Campus, 2019
Dell Interview Experience | Set 5 (For Platform Software Engineer)
Dell Interview Experience | Set 3 (On-Campus for Dell International R&D)
#53 Maximum Subarray
Dell Technologies Interview for Technical Support Engineer | On-Campus Sep 2020 (Virtual)
Dell Interview Experience | Set 8 (On-Campus)
Dell Technologies Interview Experience for Software Engineering Intern
Dell Technologies Interview Experience For Undergraduate Internship (On-Campus) 2022
Dell Technologies Interview Experience for Software Engineer 2 | On-Campus (Secureworks)
DELL EMC Interview Experience for Remote Systems Engineer
#696 Count Binary Substrings
#1328 Break a Palindrome
Dell Technologies: Interview Experience for SDE-1
Question Details
Dell Technologies came to our campus in the second week of August to fill the position of SDE - 1 (Solutions Role) - Intern + FTE 2022. They were providing a 6-month internship, which would thereafter be turned to full-time. Students with a cumulative GPA of 7.5 or above and no ongoing backlogs were eligible. Only computer science and information technology students were admitted. Approximately 600 students from our campus took part in the first round. ROUND 1 (Resume Shortlisting): They asked us to submit our most recent resumes. After 4-5 days, they selected around 90 candidates for the online test. In resume shortlisting, CGPA was not the main criterion; some students with 8.5 CGPA were not selected, while others with 7.8 CGPA took the online exam. It was primarily based on the tasks and talents shown in your résumé. ROUND 2 (Online Test - 60 minutes): The online test was held on the HirePro platform. it is a 50 question MCQ test. Out of 50, 10 questions are from Aptitude and rest are from core CS topics like DBMS, OS, Network, OOPS, C++, Java, SQL and Data Structures. I thought the online test was very long as most of the questions were conceptual and took a long time to complete. I answered 38-40 questions and got selected for the interview. Please select 12 people for the
next round. ROUND 3 (Technical Interview 1 - 45 minutes): Technical interviews took place the next day in Microsoft Teams. My interviewer was quite courteous. He asked me to introduce myself, then introduced himself. He questioned me about my projects. I described two of my initiatives to him. One included tweaking Apache Web Server, while the other was based on the LSB Image Steganography Technique. There were a few cross-questions. He was curious in the topic's motivation and the technology stack I utilized to create the projects. Following that, he asked me a lot of questions about OOPS ideas, DBMS, operating systems, and networking. Some examples included explaining the levels of the OSI Model. Topics covered include abstraction vs. data hiding, CPU scheduling strategies, and conceptual concerns. He then requested me to build encapsulation. Following this, they inquired about my favorite programming language. I mentioned C++, therefore there were many questions about it, such as how doubly linked lists are done in C++, interfaces, friend functions, and so on. He asked me two coding problems after the fundamentals of computer science. They were: https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/dsa/merging-intervals/ (He first asked the approach, and then asked me to write just the function. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/dsa/delete-nth-node-from-the-end-of-the-given-linked-list/ (He just wanted the approach for this question) The conversation then came to a close when he questioned me about some DevOps tools that I had listed in my résumé, like Git, Maven, and Docker. Five or so pupils were chosen to move on to the next phase. Round Four (30 minutes): Based mostly on my credentials, this interview was rather straightforward. Most of the questions during the interview focused on my skill set and my internships. He questioned me regarding the services offered by Microsoft Azure. having taken part in a few hackathons myself. He questioned me on the implementation of those project proposals. Subsequently, the interviewer began to ask questions about conduct, including teamwork, dispute resolution, team management, and so forth. I asked him about the internship duration and the technologies we would be working on if we are chosen as our final question of the interview. Fortunately, I was one of the three students that received an internship + FTE offer in the end. A Few Crucial Pointers It's not like the interviewer expects you to know the answers to every question in a technical interview. About 80% of the queries had answers from me. However, it's critical to respond to the questions you know with confidence. Always provide the interviewer an explanation of your technique before moving on in a live coding session. Don't freak out if your code doesn't work. Check your code again and try to identify the problem. But keep in mind that the interviewers are always more interested in your strategy than in your final product. Make sure you are familiar with every word in your CV. Never write something about which you lack confidence. Although placement season is busy, never lose confidence in yourself and don't stop reviewing the fundamentals. Best wishes to all.
Topics
More from Dell
Dell Interview Process Overview
The Dell interview process typically includes a recruiter screen, one to two technical phone screens, and a 4-6 round on-site or virtual on-site loop. Each round serves a distinct calibration purpose: coding rounds measure correctness, code quality, and complexity reasoning; system design rounds measure architectural judgment at the appropriate level; behavioral rounds measure ownership, leadership scope, and collaboration. Reports tagged on LeakCode from 2024-2026 show Dell runs a calibrated process consistent with industry norms for companies of its tier.
Difficulty calibration: Dell coding rounds typically run medium difficulty with follow-up depth as the senior discriminator. System design rounds expect production-grade trade-off articulation at L4+ levels. Behavioral rounds expect quantified outcomes ("reduced p99 latency from 800ms to 120ms") rather than vague impact claims. The candidates who advance consistently demonstrate clear thinking out loud rather than perfect final answers.
How To Use Dell Question Reports
Real candidate-reported interview questions are a calibration tool, not a memorization target. Dell updates its question pool every 2-4 months; memorizing exact problems risks misleading you when the interviewer uses a variant. The high-leverage approach: identify the patterns that appear repeatedly in Dell reports, practice those patterns on similar (not identical) problems, and use the reports to understand the interviewer's typical follow-up depth.
Filter the questions above by round type, difficulty, and recency. Focus first on reports from the past 6-12 months; older reports may reference questions that have since rotated out of Dell's pool. Reports tagged with quantified difficulty and explicit round type are higher-signal than reports without those tags. The metadata filters help you build a focused study plan in 1-2 hours rather than 8-10 hours of unstructured browsing.
Common Dell Interview Mistakes
Reports tagged "no hire" at Dell consistently surface a few patterns: jumping into code without clarifying requirements, coding silently for extended periods, missing edge cases (empty input, single element, large input, overflow), producing working code the candidate cannot refactor when probed, and behavioral stories that use "we" instead of "I" diluting individual signal. Strong candidates explicitly avoid these patterns by following a consistent round template.
The single most predictive failure mode in recent reports: not asking clarifying questions. Interviewers are explicitly trained to weight this dimension. Strong candidates ask 3-5 clarifying questions even on problems that look obvious; weak candidates dive into implementation immediately. Strong candidates also verbalize their approach before writing code; weak candidates code in silence and lose the communication dimension of the round's calibration.