Ivanti Interview Questions (2026)
1 experiences · 1p3a (1)
Top topics
Ivanti Staff Software Engineer Interview Experience
Interview Experience
Hello, I recently had an interview at
Ivanti for Staff Software Engineer on .Net, went through three rounds of interview, and here are the interview questions in case it helps others. Even after clearing all rounds I was told they decided to go with someone else.
Round 1 Basic .Net questions, then asked to review the following block of code on order processing:
public class OrderProcessor { private readonly IOrderRepository _orderRepository; private readonly IPaymentGateway _paymentGateway; private readonly IInventoryService _inventoryService; private readonly IEmailService _emailService; public OrderProcessor(IOrderRepository orderRepository, IPaymentGateway paymentGateway, IInventoryService inventoryService, IEmailService emailService) { _orderRepository = orderRepository; _paymentGateway = paymentGateway; _inventoryService = inventoryService; _emailService = emailService; } public async Task<bool> ProcessOrderAsync(Order order) { if (await _inventoryService.CheckAvailabilityAsync(order.Items)) { var paymentResult = await _paymentGateway.ProcessPaymentAsync(order.TotalAmount, order.PaymentDetails); if (paymentResult.IsSuccessful) { _orderRepository.SaveOrderAsync(order); _inventoryService.UpdateInventoryAsync(order.Items); _emailService.SendOrderConfirmationAsync(order);
**return** true; } }
**return** false; } }
Then asked to explain how I would write a program for the following:
/* Given a string s which represents an expression, evaluate this expression and return its value. The integer division should truncate toward zero. You may assume that the given expression is always valid. All intermediate results will be in the range of [-2^31, 2^31 - 1].
**Note**: You are not allowed to use any built-in function which evaluates strings as mathematical expressions, such as eval().
**Example 1**:
**Input**: s = "6/3+2*2"
**Output**: 7 Example 2:
**Input**: s = " 3/2 "
**Output**: 1 Example 3:
**Input**: s = " 3+5 / 2 "
**Output**: 5 Constraints: - s consists of integers and operators ('+', '-', '*', '/') separated by some number of spaces. - s represents a valid expression. - All the integers in the expression are non-negative integers in the range [0, 2^31 - 1]. - The answer and any intermediate results are guaranteed to fit in a 32-bit integer. */
Round 2 Entirely coding round, asked to write the program for the following question and then run it with given samples. Create a least recently used(LRU) cache and then test it against the following:
private static void TestCache() { LRUCache lRUCache = new LRUCache(4); lRUCache.put(1, 1); // cache is {1=1} lRUCache.Display(); lRUCache.put(2, 2); // cache is {1=1, 2=2} lRUCache.Display(); lRUCache.put(3, 3); // LRU key was 2, evicts key 2, cache is {1=1, 3=3} lRUCache.Display(); lRUCache.put(4, 4); // LRU key was 1, evicts key 1, cache is {4=4, 3=3} lRUCache.Display(); Console.WriteLine("Getting 2:" + lRUCache.get(2)); //
**return** 1 Console.WriteLine("Getting 3: " + lRUCache.get(3)); //
**returns** -1 (not found) Console.WriteLine("Getting 4: " + lRUCache.get(4)); //
**return** -1 (not found) Console.WriteLine("Getting 1: " + lRUCache.get(1)); //
**return** 3 lRUCache.put(5, 5); lRUCache.Display(); }
Round 3 Asked to review a block of code on .Net Core API call and System Design for below: Functional Requirements: > Million of endpoints (laptops and devices) Every 4 hrs Vulnerability data is pushed (JSON) - scan report > View it on a dashboard Top 10 vulnerabilities Want to see how many are patched. Non-Functional : > Scalability (<1MB) 1Mil x 4hrs = 0.25M/hr reliability durability Cost effective Security
Topics
Related companies
Ivanti Interview Process Overview
The Ivanti interview process typically includes a recruiter screen, one to two technical phone screens, and a 4-6 round on-site or virtual on-site loop. Each round serves a distinct calibration purpose: coding rounds measure correctness, code quality, and complexity reasoning; system design rounds measure architectural judgment at the appropriate level; behavioral rounds measure ownership, leadership scope, and collaboration. Reports tagged on LeakCode from 2024-2026 show Ivanti runs a calibrated process consistent with industry norms for companies of its tier.
Difficulty calibration: Ivanti coding rounds typically run medium difficulty with follow-up depth as the senior discriminator. System design rounds expect production-grade trade-off articulation at L4+ levels. Behavioral rounds expect quantified outcomes ("reduced p99 latency from 800ms to 120ms") rather than vague impact claims. The candidates who advance consistently demonstrate clear thinking out loud rather than perfect final answers.
How To Use Ivanti Question Reports
Real candidate-reported interview questions are a calibration tool, not a memorization target. Ivanti updates its question pool every 2-4 months; memorizing exact problems risks misleading you when the interviewer uses a variant. The high-leverage approach: identify the patterns that appear repeatedly in Ivanti reports, practice those patterns on similar (not identical) problems, and use the reports to understand the interviewer's typical follow-up depth.
Filter the questions above by round type, difficulty, and recency. Focus first on reports from the past 6-12 months; older reports may reference questions that have since rotated out of Ivanti's pool. Reports tagged with quantified difficulty and explicit round type are higher-signal than reports without those tags. The metadata filters help you build a focused study plan in 1-2 hours rather than 8-10 hours of unstructured browsing.
Common Ivanti Interview Mistakes
Reports tagged "no hire" at Ivanti consistently surface a few patterns: jumping into code without clarifying requirements, coding silently for extended periods, missing edge cases (empty input, single element, large input, overflow), producing working code the candidate cannot refactor when probed, and behavioral stories that use "we" instead of "I" diluting individual signal. Strong candidates explicitly avoid these patterns by following a consistent round template.
The single most predictive failure mode in recent reports: not asking clarifying questions. Interviewers are explicitly trained to weight this dimension. Strong candidates ask 3-5 clarifying questions even on problems that look obvious; weak candidates dive into implementation immediately. Strong candidates also verbalize their approach before writing code; weak candidates code in silence and lose the communication dimension of the round's calibration.